Go straight to the main content



murmurART

art advisory - looking for something specific or help in finding work by early career artists. contact info@murmurart.com

Review Aug 25 2010 « | »
The Marquise Went Out at Five O'Clock Curated by JottaContemporary and running until 5th September at Edel Assanti Project Space

This exhibition's title is as intriguing as it is arbitrary. Taken from the novel All the King's Horses by Michele Bernstein, the phrase epitomises the scepticism towards received narratives characteristic of the 1960s Situationist movement of which Bernstein was a member. Contempt for the prescriptive nature of both language and the structure of the city led the Situationists to practice 'detournement' - navigating the city in unexpected ways to establish a personal, alternative narrative. In this vein, this exhibition presents seven artists who take a critical approach to conventional practices of recording and reiterating.

Excerpts from Bernstein's book appear in large letters on the gallery walls. Despite this, the show seems to encourage the viewer to wander from this staunchly conceptualised underpinning: to partake in a Situationist 'drift', following the individual thematic whims of the artist rather than any prescribed curatorial pattern.

If these artists are carving their own paths, their winding detours are by definition unique and subjective. At one extreme sits the pure beauty and technical mastery of Stuart Bailes' photographs. At the other, the ostensibly political nature of Charlesworth, Lewandowski & Mann's Museum, a video about the proposed cultural regeneration of 1950s Baghdad by American architect Frank Lloyd Wright, soon gives way to a nuanced reflection on medium. The video's historical narrative is taken from Wikipedia, its images from Google. Alongside its overt commentary on cultural transplantation via architecture, this video highlights the imperialistic powers of visual and verbal language: specifically, the emerging authority given to Wikipedia's blanket narrativisation of the world's past and present history.

The best work in the show is that which is also exceedingly frustrating - a necessary paradox, since easily consumed messages are thin on the ground in an exhibition about the limitations of narrative. Jorge de la Garza's photographic collages are formed of bluntly truncated scenes and obscured body parts: eerie minimalist tales with cliff-hanger endings. The undeveloped stories behind Noemie Goudal's stunning large-scale photographs send us on fruitless deciphering missions.

In Adam Thomas' Free Fall series, paperbacks on politics, history and psychology have sections of their covers cut out to reveal the books' contents. In doing so, these texts gently ironise the book covers' attempts at an all-encompassing visual representation of what the book contains; on a deeper level, they reveal the complexities of defining abstract concepts in words. Thomas's work draws upon a conclusion central to this show: that penetrating to the heart of the matter, whether in a direct or roundabout way, rarely answers more questions than it offers.

In his Free Fall Series Adam Thomas takes a knife to old Pelican paperbacks to alter the cover design and reveal text from the book below. EH Carr's 1961 What is History? is especially striking here, with the design like a dated piece of op art perfectly suited to the combination of craft aesthetic and retro history. Yet this cutting suggests that Thomas could have made even better use of the earlier Idea of History, where RG Collingwood mocked the naivety of simplistic 'scissors and paste' historical technique.

Ostensibly grouped due to shared interests in socio-political history, documentation, and 'the archive', the artists in the show all seem to revel in the positive possibilities that scissoring up and pasting back together provide. Far from a pedestrian piecing together of received ideas, unexpected juxtapositions are used openly by all involved. Attempts are made to subvert those received ways of thinking, all the while hoping to point the way towards new.

This is most explicit in the hand collaged pairs of images by Jorge de la Garza, though a subtler approach is found in the photographs of Stuart Bailes and Noemie Goudal. Bailes's works read like minimalist sculpture stage lit and sumptuously photographed: geometric black and white wannabe Caravaggios that banish the 'theatrical' presence of the sculptural object itself to behind the picture plane.

Goudal's juxtapositions of natural and man made elements draw one in with the easy beauty of large scale colour photography. But once again it is the act of photographing her sculptural creations - be they uncannily lit eggs spread across an interior or a giant photograph receding through the back wall of a warehouse - that endow disparate elements with the unity of a single image. Sent back behind the picture plane, aspects of contrast and narrative can better develop between the parts, though it is hard to say whether cognitive affect or sheer surface pleasure wins out.

Which brings us back to Thomas, and the thought that perhaps his works perform a similar act of condensation. Is his removal of a rectangle from Bernard Williams's The Moralist to reveal 'The Amoralist' in the underlying print telling us much, or is the book merely reduced to single comment and surface pattern, rendered acceptable for those unwilling to engage with these books - and by extension the artworks - beyond a glib comment and instantly consumable image? The aims may be admirable and the works seductive but, as Carr and Collingwood knew, unintended consequences can also be just around the corner.

The Marquise Went Out at Five O'Clock runs at Edel Assanti until 5th September, see their website here.

    Comments

Add Comments

  • CAPTCHA Image