Go straight to the main content



murmurART

New showroom, work from 20 artists inc Adam Thompson, David A Smith, Adam Bainbridge, Gareth Cadwallader showing upstairs 20 Hoxton Sq now

Review Jul 03 2009 « | »
Poor. Old. Tired. Horse. A review of the new ICA show centring around the 1960s Concrete Poetry movement and its successors

The Tetris theme tune has a lot to answer for, spawning many a terrible cover, from ska to drum & bass, with its chripy 8-bit sounds. Chiptune - the musical movement that hijacks your humble Gameboy or Nintendo - has returned to manipulate these melodic monotones.

Weird at first, and more than a little bit influenced by today's cult for the fake-spectacled urban-nerd, its concept of layering the minimal to create something more than the sum of its parts is not new in any art form. Substitute the A, B, start, select for dot and dash and our almost indefinitely complex language is reduced to its visual basics. This layering of meaning in typography and syntax is difficult to miss once investigated; it was the Scottish poet and artist Ian Hamilton Finlay who said, 'stupidity reduces language to words.' I bet he only wore glasses if he actually needed to.

Poor.Old.Tired.Horse refers to a zine published by Finlay, who is credited as the key proprietor of the Concrete Poetry movement in Britain. His zine was a vessel for much of the experimentation that was taking place in this country. If the exhibition is focused on Concrete Poetry and this, in turn, is a label for the fusion of art and literature then its organisers have been far too conservative in their pigeon-holing of the work. The most successful work here envelopes much more than purely literature but instead grapples with the likes of the page as a spatial construct or, as with Liliane Lijn, discards that surface altogether for a more dynamic involvement.

Chopin and Houédard present a pattern and depth so intrinsic in their compositions that it makes their medium all the more remarkable. On one level each piece pulsates with the rhythm and complexity at the heart of its creation and yet they equally seem to occupy a projecting or architectural plane or surface. These artists seem to be pushing literature to catch up with the technological advances that had been forged around them in the early 20th Century. What Rietveld or Mondrian were exploring in complexity through ultimate abstraction of architecture and painting, the early Concrete Poets were achieving with a typewriter. The scope and concepts visible here go far beyond just poetry left on a page.

This work is, undoubtedly, the peak of the exhibition. From here it descends quickly into the all too common pandering to the established mid-century avant-garde. Tired Hockney prints demonstrate a style done better and more frequently by almost every UAL Illustration graduate going. Room Three teeters on the edge of the irrelevant, feeling more like provincial art gallery padding than a leading art centre flashing its hidden best to support an evolution. This was sadly not the promised glimpse at some important thematic undergarments. Poor.Old.Tired.Knickers.

It could have got worse - and after such a promising start - the contemporary art scene's ability to turn a new perspective into a rehashed, retro obsession (your smug arty mate who found a typewriter and a cardigan in a thrift store) is all too common.

Thankfully, the collection of contemporary artists that round off this show are much too good for my cynical impugning. The work does not exercise a selective memory and attempt the aesthetic of the early movement. Amongst the best here are Holmqvist's installation and Stark's distorted adaptations, each questioning production and display in a complex collaboration of themes.

The exhibition is a refreshing exposure of a visual complexity that was fast becoming a bad graphic design stereotype. Put the Gameboy down, there's no Helvetica in sight.

No concrete poetry exhibition can ignore Guillaume Apollinaire, and this is no exception with his name in the intro and rotating on a conical kinetic piece in the second room. But this is as far as it goes, preferring Ian Hamilton Finlay and 1960s 'Concrete Poetry movement' to the Futurist and Dadaist poems forty years before them.

At times this can make the exhibition seem to have a slightly poor, old, tired plot. The opening piece, Sea Poppy 1, particularly reminded me of the sun in Apollinaire's Calligramme 'Lettre-Ocean' and again this came back with the other circular works along the corridor to the second half of the exhibition. Although it was strange to think I would remember text by its shape over its content, and that such an open shape as the circle could do this, it happened.

Liliane Lijn spinning cones in the second room might add to this sense of fatigue, sounding and looking like they were built by Dalek costume designers. But once taken in, the oscillating word fragments ("Protons are positive. Are you? Are you? Electrons are negative. Are you? Are you?...") actually come across as a fascinating mix of visual and lyrical, ordinarily opposite in concrete poetry.

Generally the best pieces are those which divert from established concrete poetry. In the last room, dedicated to the work of six younger artists working today, Sue Tomkins' typewriter art is a real highlight, and her description as a 'rebellious offspring' of the movement reminded me that at root this for of expression was involved in subverting the set rules of literary expression. Those interested in nonsensical accompanying text should read the introduction to this room, where it explains that these artists "create... sometimes utopian forms of expression" - whatever that is.

This utopian fantasy has been edited by the time it reached publication in 'Roland', a very interesting magazine that accompanies the exhibition, introducing the artists and presenting tangential essays and work. It does make you wonder a little why this exhibition, whose title is a magazine name and whose work is largely displayed on page, was not a magazine.

One of the best essays, by Douglas Coupland asks the question, when you see words in your mind, what font are they written in? Ten-year-olds now discuss fonts, leading and flushing paragraphs, he says, because of the learning potential brought by computers. It immediately reminded me of another statistic - that the average age of a person uploading a video onto 'bebo' is 8 years old. That is to say 8 years is the average age of somebody recording and publishing a video.

Apollinaire's Calligrammes and Futurists visual writing were born from an interest in with the rapid advancement of mass communication almost a hundred years ago. My frustration with this exhibition, though it covers a subject I love, is that this spirit within visual considerations of the written word is not presented as continuing in-step with progress since then.

Poor.Old.Tired.Horse at the ICA runs from 17th June to the 23rd August, daily 12pm - 7pm (9pm on Thursdays). Entry is free. See the ICA website for more details.

    Comments

  • hugely interesting to read these dialogues. curiously it was only the other day that i was discussing with a friend of mine about what varying fonts we use in our heads as signifiers for the words we are imagining... of course we managed to conclude nothing but it was an engaging thought all the same! Posted by: simon

Add Comments

  • CAPTCHA Image