Go straight to the main content



murmurART

Nancy Fouts show extended until end of July. A must see. 52 Oakley Square, NW1

Review Sep 16 2009 « | »
Hands Stuffing a Mattress at Josh Lilley Gallery The Painter Sarah Dwyer kicks off Josh Lilley's Autumn season

I could spend all day here, basking in the bafflement, the seduction and the slow, sly game of these works. In a sense, Sarah Dwyer's new solo show is the closest thing you can get to cloud gazing in an overlit, windowless basement. And yet, quite frankly, clouds are pretty boring compared to these strange, imploding, gawkily magnificent paintings.

I could spend all day here, basking in the bafflement, the seduction and the slow, sly game of these works. In a sense, Sarah Dwyer's new solo show is the closest thing you can get to cloud gazing in an overlit, windowless basement. And yet, quite frankly, clouds are pretty boring compared to these strange, imploding, gawkily magnificent paintings.

Some seem to depict a single, amorphous form. Buckshee's compound-globule of vivid hues seems to erupt out of a conch-like cone, a riotously colourful sea creature as ever there was. And yet a figural 'explanation' cannot begin to contain the complex dynamics of any of the works here. Each wavers between surface and depth, flatness and three-dimensionality, rough brushwork and blended fluidity.

The eye (and the mind) is constantly challenged, surprised. Try getting lost in the infinitely mysterious, purply depths of Smoothing Sunday Evening, and that dirty yellow blob will pull you back. Try sensing Roundelay's massed areas and two dimensional, as if looking down on a strange continent, and you'll be helpless against the sense that it's lifting, raising itself up on knobbled limbs, wearing what looks strangely like a cavalier's hat.

Such instances of partial recognition are elicited time and again by Dwyer's strange, encompassing works. Her painterly marks often waver on the edge of form - partially evoking something, but not quite. And her colour palette is distinctive: occasionally unnerving, always utterly surprising. If it weren't enough that Roundelay's acqua expanse gives way to pale pink, emerald green, maroon and white, there's a slick of egg yolk yellow to keep you on your toes.

But what really marks Dwyer's work as extraordinary is its complex play of surface and depth, and attendant exploration of painterly process. This is wonderfully demonstrated by the two small-scale untitled works which flank Tread Softly(for me the show's magical centrepiece). Here, darkly lit depths of rich ochre are overlaid with impulsive-looking daubs of mauve, turquoise and white. The immediacy of these marks - their brushstrokes are visible, light-handed, almost scrawl-like - introduces an element of timing. It's as if they were impulsive afterthoughts - a flippant, pastel-hued coda to the intractable vastness behind.

There's a humour to these works, a certain oddness, and something mischeavous for sure. But to overplay this would be to deny the strange, beguiling presence of them; their slow, weighty beauty. For all their play on timing, like the best paintings, Dwyer's works seem to exist outside time. They are at once immediate and eternal, breathtaking and slowly-dawning.

Sarah Dwyer's show, Hands Stuffing a Mattress, is showing at Josh Lilley Gallery between 11th September and 8th October.

Josh Lilley's new(ish) gallery feels a bit like a shop. It's got those big glass shopfront-style windows and the ceilings are low. And at the opening of Sarah Dwyer's new exhibition, Hands Stuffing A Mattress, I overheard what seemed like an unusual number of conversations about how much the paintings cost. Maybe that added to the shop feel. Anyway, it was kind of distracting, especially as her paintings are shifting, multilayered pieces that seem to want a more meditative approach than I could manage. That is my disclaimer.

But I did wonder if they perhaps resist interpretation. That's another disclaimer. These paintings don't want to be held to anything, not even a particular manner of applying paint - the brushstrokes are sometimes confident but hazy, sometimes urgent but apparently aimless. Despite how much attention is drawn to the application of paint - at times you could almost see the press of the brush - the best of the paintings were airy, or perhaps liquid, or anyway the sum of a lot of heavy detail ends up being surprisingly light.

I'd spent the day before looking at the new Hubble telescope photos, but I don't think it was just proximity in time that made me see outer space in some of the works. The shapes are unmoored and mysterious, like the Hubble pictures, and although they felt a little out of reach it seemed as if they might have yielded to someone else's interpretations, just like scientists try to unpick galactic images for us, though we don't really understand.

I found the smaller canvases a bit less satisfying - Dwyer's translucent style worked better in a bigger space, where you could see the layers of paint submerging each other and the drifting shapes falling or climbing across the canvas. When she plays with light effects, Dwyer is consummately painterly, conjuring a weird opalescence that feels definitely art-historical, though here it's in service of abstraction.

Having said that, everything seems to teeter on the brink of becoming figurative. It makes you keep looking, and there are all these depths and shallows to look into. I thought of rock pools and archaeological digs, because Dwyer does volume and height just as well as she does light. And even when, as in the ornate Bocca del Cielo, the works are exuberantly self-generating, they exude a calm self-sufficiency. They are busy thinking about themselves - you can almost imagine them continuing to grow after-hours, like a fungus in the dark. In the end, despite the overheard shoptalk, the paintings' quiet charisma won out.

    Comments

Add Comments

  • CAPTCHA Image